AI vs Manual Contract Comparison: Speed, Risk Visibility & Vendor Alignment

• Why manual contract review slows procurement down
• How CompareX automates supplier contract analysis
• Direct workflow comparison: AI vs manual review
• Risks and deviations CompareX flags instantly
• How to get started in under 2 minutes

Reviewing supplier contracts manually requires time, legal support, and consistency - which procurement teams rarely have at scale. When timelines are tight and dozens of documents are in-flight, manual review becomes a bottleneck.

• 2–3 hours per agreement, even for common templates
• High reliance on playbooks and checklists
• Key clause risks often buried or overlooked

CompareX removes that bottleneck with instant clause-level visibility and automated policy checks.

CompareX compares a vendor agreement to your procurement baseline (or template) and automatically:

• Flags changes, missing clauses, and deviations from policy
• Applies your internal risk standards to highlight concerns
• Answers procurement-specific questions in plain English
• Summarises findings for faster stakeholder alignment

It’s more than redlining - it’s AI-driven risk insight for procurement at scale.

• Unlimited liability added to indemnification
• Jurisdiction changed from preferred region
• Insurance limits removed or reduced
• Payment terms extended beyond company policy
• Key audit or termination rights omitted

1. Upload your procurement baseline or template
2. Upload the vendor agreement
3. Click *Compare*
4. See flagged risks, plain-English insights, and download an exportable summary

Procurement shouldn’t spend hours reviewing contracts or risk approving supplier terms that don’t align with internal policies. CompareX delivers instant visibility, faster reviews, and scalable oversight - in just two minutes.